Goldfish & Grief

Mrs. Marie C. Keiser

Mommy?” My five-year-old looked up at me, lips quivering, face tear-streaked. “Why do things have to change?”

It all started with a pet goldfish. A bag of five goldfish, in fact, purchased for a total price of eighty-five cents plus tax. Once introduced to their new home in the aquarium in our dining room, the tiny glorified carp swam happily for a few days, nibbling on goldfish flakes eagerly dispensed by their young admirers. My husband and I congratulated ourselves on a good idea. The pretty fish would entertain the children, and the children would learn responsibility by caring for the fish. If anyone made a mistake or neglected the fish with childish carelessness, no matter: replacements are only seventeen cents each.

But then, one day, tragedy struck. Perhaps tiring of their unvaried diet of flakes, the fish moved onto more exciting fare: each other. The chosen entrée was the smallest of the bunch, a silvery morsel of piscine life upon whom my daughter had bestowed the mysterious name Chickadeedeedeedeedee. (For the sake of ink, let’s just call him Chickadee hereafter).

We found Chickadee one morning looking battered and damaged, barely able to swim with his truncated tail, which apparently had proved too delicious for his finned companions to pass up. Hoping he would recover, we removed him from the shared tank and placed him in a jar, a sort of fish hospital. But the damage was too deep, and he breathed his last watery breath soon after. “Looks like the fish died,” I said, my mind already going through options for disposing of a diminutive fish corpse. Flush it down the toilet? Give it an honorable burial in the backyard? Maybe just throw it in the kitchen trash?

It was at that moment that my daughter began her mourning. Loud, prolonged, unfeigned lamentation.

It’s a confusing thing, watching your child mourn a goldfish. Part of me wanted to laugh. A seventeen-cent goldfish — sold as fish food — hardly deserves to be mourned, I thought to myself. Life is full of suffering; save your tears for something that matters, little one. Fortunately, the sincerity of her grief stopped me from saying that aloud, reminding me that this was the first time she had ever encountered the death of a creature she loved.

She had, of course, encountered other natural losses. Like Margaret, who mourns the falling leaves in Gerard Manley Hopkins’ poem “Spring and Fall,” my daughter had experienced the sort of death that comes with the changing of the seasons. She had cried over the fading spirea blossoms of the last spring. I had told her then that flowers must die so that their seeds may grow, and then the flowers would be born again the following spring. But I had also been forced to admit even then that they would be different flowers. Equally beautiful, perhaps, but not the same flowers; not the ones she’d come to love.

But the death of her fish was a new kind of loss. “Why?” she demanded between sobs, “Why did Chickadee have to die?”

 

I had told her then that flowers must die so that their seeds may grow, and then the flowers would be born again the following spring. But I had also been forced to admit even then that they would be different flowers.

As I thought through what to tell her, I had to face the fact that there was no answer that was both comforting and true: no fish-heaven that God called him home to, no cycle of fish reincarnation giving meaning to his death. Death is part of life. Fish are nasty carnivores and they eat each other. End of story. So I told her that, though as kindly and gently as I could. Then I wrote the fish’s name on a tiny box, slipped the corpse into it, and my daughter and I buried it under a bush in the yard as rain fell on our umbrella.

That was not the end of her grief, however. She followed a long and varied mourning process in the days to come. One night she drew a picture of her deceased fish in the aquarium with the others, “so that he would be remembered.” Then she cried herself to sleep. She would burst into tears when I least expected it and made ritual visits to the grave. “Chickadee is in my memory,” she told me once, after such a visit.

I wanted to help. I wanted to make it easier for her, or perhaps to bring some sense of proportion.  The philosophy student in me would have liked to explain further about the contingent nature of material things: “My dear child, Chickadee was a material, composite being and therefore inherently corruptible. Unlike God, his essence is not the same as his existence, but separate from it, and now that his matter has lost its form of fishiness and become instead a corpse, it will break down into its material components.”

But somehow the moment didn’t seem right for introducing my daughter to the philosophical tradition of hylomorphism, beautiful though that tradition is. It seemed more like a moment for a lot of hugging. And so that is what we did: we hugged a lot, she cried in my arms, and I cried too. Because, while mourning a seventeen-cent fish might seem silly, death, destruction — even just change — are inevitable yet abhorrent. And I knew that it wasn’t really the fish she was mourning, or at least not only the fish. As Hopkins writes: “Nor mouth had, no nor mind, expressed / What heart heard of, ghost guessed: / It is the blight man was born for, / It is Margaret you mourn for.”

It is Margaret you mourn for. I didn’t cry for the goldfish — I had lost the ability to cry for pets twenty years earlier when my own beloved pet died. No, I cried for myself, for my daughter, for my husband, for my sons. And I think my daughter did too, whether she understood it or not. We wept for our own mortality. Because, like a goldfish, human life is beautiful — and fragile.

Our immortal spirits, made for the love of a changeless, perfect, eternal God, rage against the limits of our material natures. We rage against death most of all, for death takes from us the ones we love.

But it is not only death we mourn: it is every change that comes to us. Even the best changes, like the healthy growth of a baby, hold an element of tragedy. This is what older people mean when they tell young parents that their adorable but obnoxious toddlers will “grow up too fast.” The particular charms of childhood will be lost in the transition to adulthood, and each year does bring us closer to the grave. So we cling desperately to the present moment, not wishing to part with what we have, fearing that what we receive in exchange will not be as good.

And truly every change cuts us off from what came before, so every change is a small death. It is a reminder that we are exiles, and that this earth, beautiful as it can be, is not our home. “We have not here a lasting city.”

The open grave reminds us that we must seek our lasting city elsewhere. But part of that seeking is continuing to live, continuing to love, continuing to thank God for the beautiful things he has given us. And so Chickadee(deedeedeedee) has been replaced by a black and orange fish, whose flowy tail wafts gracefully behind him as he swims. My daughter thinks he’s pretty, and the other fish have shown no interest in eating him.

Life goes on, every wave and every ripple on its surface bringing us closer to the eternal shore.HF

Feel Less FRANTIC and More Grounded

One to two newsletters from Hearth & Field per month.
100% excellent content, worthy of your time (and therefore, we would venture to say, your inbox).